Project

General

Profile

Actions

Feature #4558

closed

clean up getacepreset.php output

Added by Anchi Cheng over 7 years ago. Updated over 6 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
Category:
-
Target version:
Start date:
11/01/2016
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:

Description

It currently show many confidence measurement matrix. Need to clean up since some of them are not used much any more. I also want to add package resolution in there since Gctf and CTFFIND4 both have this output and it is saved in the Appion database.

Actions #1

Updated by Anchi Cheng over 7 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Assigned
  • Assignee set to Neil Voss

Neil,

I need to hear from you which ones you feel o.k. to remove from the display. I think confidence_5_peak and/or confidence_30_10 are the least used.

Actions #2

Updated by Neil Voss over 7 years ago

Hard to say, confidence is a good measure when comparing different packages and last I checked it was the default filter in makestack.

Actions #3

Updated by Anchi Cheng over 7 years ago

If I am tracing the function right, makestack uses apCtf.ctfdb.getBestCtfValue function without sortType specified. Therefore, it is using res80 as primary scoring as default. Only if res80 is not available, it will use calculateConfidence function that takes the maximum of 30/10, 5_peaks, and the package defined confidence. How about displaying them as one item ?

80% of phase plate data which in general has defocus of -0.5 um could not generate apCtf.ctfdisplay analysis results. I need to show package resolution while fitting all of the displays in one line.

Actions #4

Updated by Neil Voss over 7 years ago

Yes, but I think it uses the 80% confidence before entering the loop to outright reject images. Check the pre-loop functions.

I hope to take a look at fixing my stuff for phase plates when I get time again.

Actions #5

Updated by Anchi Cheng over 7 years ago

Fixing ctfdisplay analysis would be a different issue. I, for one, don't use that cutoff in makestack any more because they have little predictive power for high resolution data analysis.

Actions #6

Updated by Anchi Cheng over 7 years ago

The 80% confidence cut off for rejecting image also uses calculateConfidenceScore. Therefore, I am going to display one value based on that algorithm. Call it conf (Appion) unless there is objection.

Actions #7

Updated by Anchi Cheng over 7 years ago

  • Status changed from Assigned to In Test

committed the change. Only make confidenceScore correct for this case, though. myamiweb output of bestdb is quite a mess. It should be unified.

Actions #8

Updated by Bridget Carragher over 7 years ago

Seemms like a good plan to me - I also find these conf values very confusing.

Actions #9

Updated by Neil Voss over 7 years ago

Thanks Anchi, I think your plan is good.

Actions #10

Updated by Anchi Cheng over 6 years ago

  • Status changed from In Test to Closed
Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF