Beam Tilt Imager » History » Version 2
Amber Herold, 04/27/2010 02:30 PM
1 | 1 | Amber Herold | h1. Beam Tilt Imager |
---|---|---|---|
2 | |||
3 | |||
4 | |||
5 | To achieve high resolution, the electron beam is best to be parallel and aligned with the |
||
6 | optical axis of the lenses at the specimen. This is particularly important if better than 5 |
||
7 | Angstrum resolution is required. |
||
8 | |||
9 | |||
10 | |||
11 | |||
12 | * Parallel beam can be practically achieved for low dose condition in the Nanoprobe |
||
13 | mode of FEI microscope. In Microprobe mode that is more commonly used, a smaller C2 |
||
14 | condensor aperture will provide more parallel beam although never truly parallel. The |
||
15 | current rotation center alignment that listed above provides a reasonable average beam |
||
16 | tilt for given illumination area at the specimen. Since smaller C2 condensor aperture |
||
17 | lets thourgh smaller percentage of the beam through, the beam intensity is lowered. |
||
18 | Therefore, a larger spot size (smaller spot number) need to be used to give similiar |
||
19 | illumination. |
||
20 | |||
21 | |||
22 | For example, at NRAMM, we improved our parallelity of the same illumination area in |
||
23 | the final exposure by switching from 100 um C2 aperture with C1 spot 5 to 50 um C2 |
||
24 | aperture with C1 spot 3. |
||
25 | |||
26 | |||
27 | |||
28 | |||
29 | * The average beam tilt (theta) realtive to the optical axis achieved by rotation |
||
30 | center alignment can be further refined by the so-called coma-free alignment. There are |
||
31 | tools in Leginon that can help you do so found in the application "Alignment" |
||
32 | |||
33 | |||
34 | If the image acquired at on-axis average beam tilt (theta=0) has minimal astigmation |
||
35 | in its power spectrum (or diffractogram), the more the beam is tilted away from the |
||
36 | optical axis, the stronger astigmation would be observed. The "Beam Tilt Imager" node in |
||
37 | the application generate Diffractogram tableaus by user-defined additional beam tilt and |
||
38 | number of tilt directions to be measured. The objective is to adjust the average beam |
||
39 | tilt value so that the the diffractograms of the tilts in the opposite but equal value |
||
40 | relative to the average beam tilt look similar. |
||
41 | |||
42 | |||
43 | |||
44 | |||
45 | * The tableau is displayed in a normal Cartisian coordinate. with x+ towards right |
||
46 | and y+ toward top. |
||
47 | |||
48 | |||
49 | |||
50 | |||
51 | * Reduce the additional tilt angle if the astigmation is too large for |
||
52 | comparison. |
||
53 | |||
54 | |||
55 | |||
56 | |||
57 | * Move the beam tilt towards the direction of the tilted diffractogram that has a |
||
58 | astigmation closer to the untilted diffractogram shown at the center. |
||
59 | 2 | Amber Herold | |
60 | |||
61 | |||
62 | ______ |
||
63 | |||
64 | [[Beam Tilt Calibrator|< Beam Tilt Calibrator]] | [[Click Target Finder|Click Target Finder >]] |
||
65 | |||
66 | ______ |