Running the application » History » Version 17
Anchi Cheng, 07/15/2010 09:24 PM
| 1 | 1 | Amber Herold | h1. Running the application |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | |||
| 3 | |||
| 4 | |||
| 5 | h2. Import Notes about Image Intensity Recorded through |
||
| 6 | Tomography Node |
||
| 7 | |||
| 8 | |||
| 9 | |||
| 10 | 14 | Amber Herold | Tomography node saves the images in a different format from other Acquisition nodes. By |
| 11 | 1 | Amber Herold | default, the flat-field correct CCD counts are multiplied by 10 and converted to signed |
| 12 | 16-bit integer before the image is displayed and saved. This makes CCD counts of 3276.8 or |
||
| 13 | larger overflow to negatives. Other Leginon Acquisition images are saved as float without |
||
| 14 | manipulation. |
||
| 15 | |||
| 16 | |||
| 17 | To avoid this problem, find out what exposure time corresponds to the fractionated dose |
||
| 18 | from your tilt angle step and range and total dose and take an image at tomo preset with |
||
| 19 | such an exposure in Navigation node. You will need to reduce the total dose if a good |
||
| 20 | fraction of the counts are larger than 3200 even though it would not appear to be saturated |
||
| 21 | in the float scale without the 10x factor. Alternatively, change the scale factor in |
||
| 22 | Tomography node. |
||
| 23 | |||
| 24 | |||
| 25 | |||
| 26 | |||
| 27 | |||
| 28 | h2. Multiscale Imaging |
||
| 29 | |||
| 30 | |||
| 31 | |||
| 32 | * Preset image shift alignment/beam shift alignment are the same as in MSI |
||
| 33 | application |
||
| 34 | |||
| 35 | |||
| 36 | 5 | Amber Herold | * New dark/bright references should be reacquired for "tomo" preset that acquires the |
| 37 | 1 | Amber Herold | final data. It is best to do this at the same dose per tomography image calculated from |
| 38 | the total dose, the tilt parameters, and the dose measurement. |
||
| 39 | |||
| 40 | |||
| 41 | * For best focusing result, perform autofocus at the same magnification as the |
||
| 42 | tomography data collection, align microscope well at the eucentric focus and the |
||
| 43 | rotation center and save them before data collection. |
||
| 44 | |||
| 45 | |||
| 46 | |||
| 47 | |||
| 48 | |||
| 49 | |||
| 50 | |||
| 51 | h2. Using Tomography Preview |
||
| 52 | |||
| 53 | |||
| 54 | |||
| 55 | * Preview targets (pink) can be selected when selecting targets in "Tomography |
||
| 56 | Targeting" |
||
| 57 | |||
| 58 | |||
| 59 | * When the targets are processed, targets that are of the type "preview" are |
||
| 60 | processed before focus and acquisition targets. |
||
| 61 | |||
| 62 | |||
| 63 | * Tomography Preview node acquires a image at the preview target using "preview" |
||
| 64 | preset which should be set at minimal dose. |
||
| 65 | |||
| 66 | |||
| 67 | |||
| 68 | |||
| 69 | |||
| 70 | |||
| 71 | |||
| 72 | h2. Dose Measurement |
||
| 73 | |||
| 74 | |||
| 75 | |||
| 76 | If "Measure Dose before collection" is checked in Tomography node, the stage will be |
||
| 77 | moved to the reference target and a dose image of the "tomo" preset will be acquired (center |
||
| 78 | 512x512 of whateven binning of the preset) before each tilt series if the interval between |
||
| 79 | the series is longer than the limit time set in the settings of Dose Measurement node. The |
||
| 80 | measured value will then be used to recalculate the proper exposure time for tomography |
||
| 81 | imaging. |
||
| 82 | |||
| 83 | |||
| 84 | For this function to behave properly, the followings should be done during |
||
| 85 | operation: |
||
| 86 | |||
| 87 | |||
| 88 | * One, and only one, "reference" target should be selected in either "Square |
||
| 89 | Targeting" or "Hole Targeting" or "Tomography Targeting" node. The reference target |
||
| 90 | should be of either a broken square or a empty hole if no broken square can be |
||
| 91 | found. |
||
| 92 | |||
| 93 | |||
| 94 | * "Measure Dose" before collection should be selected in Tomography node. |
||
| 95 | |||
| 96 | |||
| 97 | * "Exposure time max/min" in Tomography node should be in a range that can accommodate |
||
| 98 | the electron beam fluctuation over time. |
||
| 99 | |||
| 100 | |||
| 101 | |||
| 102 | |||
| 103 | |||
| 104 | |||
| 105 | |||
| 106 | h2. Align Zero Loss Peak |
||
| 107 | |||
| 108 | |||
| 109 | |||
| 110 | This function applies only to Gatan energy filter EFTEM. If "Align ZLP before |
||
| 111 | collection" is checked in Tomography node, the stage will be moved to the reference target |
||
| 112 | and starts the procedure to align zero loss peak before each tilt series if the interval |
||
| 113 | between the series is longer than the limit time set in the settings of Dose Measurement |
||
| 114 | node. |
||
| 115 | |||
| 116 | |||
| 117 | For this function to behave properly, the followings should be done during |
||
| 118 | operation: |
||
| 119 | |||
| 120 | |||
| 121 | * One, and only one, "reference" target should be selected in either "Square |
||
| 122 | Targeting" or "Hole Targeting" or "Tomography Targeting" node. The reference target |
||
| 123 | should be of either a broken square or a empty hole if no broken square can be found. |
||
| 124 | This is the same reference target used for dose measurement. |
||
| 125 | |||
| 126 | |||
| 127 | * "Align ZLP" before collection should be selected in Tomography node. |
||
| 128 | |||
| 129 | |||
| 130 | |||
| 131 | |||
| 132 | |||
| 133 | |||
| 134 | |||
| 135 | h2. Low Magnification Model Fitting |
||
| 136 | |||
| 137 | |||
| 138 | |||
| 139 | The fitting of optical axis offset does not always works if the offset is so large that |
||
| 140 | the feature moves out of view with even a small tilt. In such a case, it is worth first |
||
| 141 | collect a tomography series at a lower magnification to define roughly the model. |
||
| 142 | |||
| 143 | |||
| 144 | At beginning of each session, or forced by the user, the model is initialized. By |
||
| 145 | default, at the initialization, Tomography node uses past fitting results that show good |
||
| 146 | agreement with the experimental data at the magnification of the preset used. If a good |
||
| 147 | model is not found, that from lower magnifications will be used. It is possible to force the |
||
| 148 | node to use a model fitted at a particular magnification by selecting it in |
||
| 149 | Tomography/Settings/Model. |
||
| 150 | |||
| 151 | |||
| 152 | Therefore, we recommend that, in case of fitting failure on good contrast images, the |
||
| 153 | followings should be done: |
||
| 154 | |||
| 155 | |||
| 156 | 3 | Amber Herold | # Tomography/Settings/Image Acquisition> change the preset to "hl". |
| 157 | # Tomography/Settings> adjust Tilt and Exposure parameters to match. |
||
| 158 | # Acquire the tiltseries images. |
||
| 159 | # If the tracking is good, change the preset back. |
||
| 160 | # Tomography/Settings/Model> Initialize with the model of (the mag of "hl" |
||
| 161 | 1 | Amber Herold | preset). |
| 162 | 3 | Amber Herold | # Acquire the tomo-series. |
| 163 | # If tracking is good, change back to Initialize with the model of "this preset and |
||
| 164 | 1 | Amber Herold | lower" mag. |
| 165 | |||
| 166 | |||
| 167 | |||
| 168 | |||
| 169 | |||
| 170 | |||
| 171 | |||
| 172 | h2. What is a Good Tilt-Axis Model? |
||
| 173 | |||
| 174 | |||
| 175 | |||
| 176 | 5 | Amber Herold | The goniometer-tilt-axis-based tracking model developed by Zheng et. al. corrects the |
| 177 | specimen height (z-axis) by a change of defocus using measured shift of feature shifts in |
||
| 178 | 1 | Amber Herold | the images (x and y-axes). The tracking in the x and y directions does not involve the use |
| 179 | 5 | Amber Herold | of such model, but is done by smooth curve fitting or preceding tilts. Therefore, to judge |
| 180 | 1 | Amber Herold | the adequacy of the model, one should check the resulting defocii of the images in the |
| 181 | series remain unchanged. |
||
| 182 | |||
| 183 | |||
| 184 | On the other hand, the feature tracking in x and y is likely to fail only if the tilting |
||
| 185 | does not induce a smooth shift of the imaging feature a sudden drop of specimen position at |
||
| 186 | a particular tilt angle often throws off the smooth curve fitting. It is possible to reduce |
||
| 187 | such effect by increasing the number of data points included in the smoothing as set in the |
||
| 188 | model section of the tomography node settings window. Otherwise, the goniometer need to be |
||
| 189 | serviced. |
||
| 190 | |||
| 191 | h2. Checking and Improving Tilt-Axis Model |
||
| 192 | |||
| 193 | |||
| 194 | |||
| 195 | Test runs should be done at the magnification, defocus, and tilts up to the highest |
||
| 196 | values planned for the real ones with a specimen with isotropic features in view and |
||
| 197 | adjusted to eucentric height. Tilt steps should be made to allow at least 15 images taken |
||
| 198 | per tilt direction. |
||
| 199 | |||
| 200 | |||
| 201 | |||
| 202 | 4 | Amber Herold | h3. First Test Run: Fixed Model |
| 203 | 1 | Amber Herold | |
| 204 | |||
| 205 | |||
| 206 | The first time the tomography application is used on a microscope, all model |
||
| 207 | parameters are default to zero. A test run should be done with the specimen at eucentric |
||
| 208 | height and all default settings including "keep the tilt axis parameters fixed" activated. |
||
| 209 | If the feature tracking is good, and the defocii of the images in the tilt series do not |
||
| 210 | significantly changed, the goniometer behavior and camera alignment are close to ideal, |
||
| 211 | and no improvement of the model is required. |
||
| 212 | |||
| 213 | |||
| 214 | If the xy tracking deteriorates quickly in the first few tilts, the magnification |
||
| 215 | should be dropped so that tracking is possible through out the tilt series. Once a rough |
||
| 216 | model is established, refinement can then be done at higher magnifications. |
||
| 217 | |||
| 218 | |||
| 219 | |||
| 220 | |||
| 221 | |||
| 222 | 4 | Amber Herold | h3. Runs to Improve the Model-Fitting |
| 223 | 1 | Amber Herold | |
| 224 | |||
| 225 | |||
| 226 | A complete tilt model fitting is difficult with small number of data points or at only |
||
| 227 | low tilts. Therefore, two tilt series need to be taken in order to get a good averaged |
||
| 228 | model that is later fixed. |
||
| 229 | |||
| 230 | |||
| 231 | 4 | Amber Herold | # tomography/settings/model>deactivate "keep the tilt axis parameters |
| 232 | 1 | Amber Herold | fixed". |
| 233 | 4 | Amber Herold | # tomography/settings/model>initialize the model with "this preset only" unless |
| 234 | 1 | Amber Herold | this is a refinement of <link linkend="Tomo_low_mag_fitting">a rough model obtained at |
| 235 | a lower magnification</link>, in which case, initialize the model with "this preset |
||
| 236 | and lower mags". |
||
| 237 | 4 | Amber Herold | # tomography/toolbar>click on "reset learning" !http://emg.nysbc.org/software/leginon/images/icons/refresh.png! to have |
| 238 | 1 | Amber Herold | a fresh start of tilt series data included in the fitting. |
| 239 | 4 | Amber Herold | # Presets Manager>send the "tomo" preset to scope. |
| 240 | # tomography>Start the tilt series image collection by clicking on "Simulated |
||
| 241 | 1 | Amber Herold | Target" tool. |
| 242 | 4 | Amber Herold | # repeat 4 and 5 to dynamically fit the model the second time if the first one goes |
| 243 | 1 | Amber Herold | to completion. |
| 244 | 4 | Amber Herold | If the target shifts away during the run, reduce the magnification, repeat 1 |
| 245 | 1 | Amber Herold | through 9 in this procedure and then return to the higher, intended mag and refined |
| 246 | the model using the same procedure and proper setting for refinement as mentioned in |
||
| 247 | 2. |
||
| 248 | 4 | Amber Herold | # Check on web image viewer to see if the result of the second run in step 6 |
| 249 | 1 | Amber Herold | produces images of constant defocus through out each half of the tilt seriese. |
| 250 | 4 | Amber Herold | # If the model is good, activate "keep the tilt axis parameters fixed" in the |
| 251 | 1 | Amber Herold | tomography settings. |
| 252 | 4 | Amber Herold | # Repeat step 2. Other than reset the learning, the tool produces an output of image |
| 253 | 1 | Amber Herold | shift you should copy down and apply to the "tomo" preset in the future runs. |
| 254 | |||
| 255 | |||
| 256 | |||
| 257 | |||
| 258 | |||
| 259 | |||
| 260 | |||
| 261 | |||
| 262 | |||
| 263 | h2. Understand the results of the model fitting |
||
| 264 | |||
| 265 | |||
| 266 | |||
| 267 | If the above procedure does not yield a good model, it is necessary to study the graphs |
||
| 268 | 5 | Amber Herold | output by the run to determine possible causes and derive the best fixed model that at least |
| 269 | 1 | Amber Herold | work for most angles. |
| 270 | |||
| 271 | 17 | Anchi Cheng | [[Fitting the tilt axis model]] |
| 272 | 1 | Amber Herold | |
| 273 | Figure 1 shows a typical result from the first dynamically fitted tilt series run. x and |
||
| 274 | y axes contains the tilt axis and are referenced to columns and rows on the images acquired. |
||
| 275 | z-axis is parallel to the electron beam. The "Prediction" data in the x and y-axis plot is |
||
| 276 | 5 | Amber Herold | the extrapolated result of the smooth curve fitting from preceding (usually 4) tilts to the |
| 277 | 1 | Amber Herold | current tilt angle. The "Position" is where features on the specimen end up to be relative |
| 278 | to the origin of the image shift at the scope as determined by correlation of images. Both |
||
| 279 | "Prediction" and "Position" are expressed in microns. The "Feature" is the shift of the |
||
| 280 | feature on the image. It corresponds to the difference between "Prediction" and "Position" |
||
| 281 | and is expressed in pixels of the image acquired. The z-axis "Prediction" is the correction |
||
| 282 | of defocus, i.e., specimen z-height change, the current model suggests and applied for each |
||
| 283 | tilt angle to keep the specimen focused. Originally, it is possible to measure defocus at |
||
| 284 | each tilt and obtain "Measured" values in this plot. However, the function is currently |
||
| 285 | disabled because the procedure does give accurate results. |
||
| 286 | |||
| 287 | |||
| 288 | According to the Zheng et. al. model, the tilt-axis can be characterized by three |
||
| 289 | parameters: phi, the angle between the tilt axis and the detector x axis (column), offset, |
||
| 290 | the distance between the center of the detector and the tilt axis on the xy plane, and z0, |
||
| 291 | the distance between the specimen from the xy plane that contains the tilt axis. If the tilt |
||
| 292 | axis is parallel to x-axis of the detector, and that the model does not change through the |
||
| 293 | tilt series, y-axis(row) "Prediction" and "Position" should remain constant. While the same |
||
| 294 | values for x-axis follows a cosine curve as it tilts if the only deviation from the ideal |
||
| 295 | model is an offset of the tilt axis from detector center in x-direction (non-zero offset). |
||
| 296 | On the other hand, if the only deviation the ideal model is an offset in z direction |
||
| 297 | 16 | Anchi Cheng | (non-zero z0), the projected object moves according to a sine function, as shown here: |
| 298 | !tilt.png! |
||
| 299 | 1 | Amber Herold | |
| 300 | As a first tilt series used in the model fitting, the data is not fitted until it |
||
| 301 | 5 | Amber Herold | accumulate enough data points and spread over more tilts. We arbitrarily select 30 degrees as |
| 302 | 1 | Amber Herold | the starting angle where the fit is started. As can be seen in Figure 1, the model is |
| 303 | significantly different from the initial as z-axis "Prediction" jumps once the fitting is |
||
| 304 | started. In particular, the model z0 which corresponds to the offset of the specimen from |
||
| 305 | the tilt axis in z direction dominates deviation. Such problem is evident by the |
||
| 306 | 5 | Amber Herold | near-straight line feature shift in x-axis over more than 1 um. There is also some offset in |
| 307 | 1 | Amber Herold | x direction since the "Prediction" and "Position" flattens somewhat as it approaches zero |
| 308 | tilt. The tilt axis has minimal tilt from x-axis since in the y-direction, despite the bump |
||
| 309 | at about 40 degrees, the range of variation in the whole tilt series is about 0.06 |
||
| 310 | um. |
||
| 311 | |||
| 312 | |||
| 313 | 6 | Amber Herold | *Figure 1* |
| 314 | !http://emg.nysbc.org/software/leginon/images/images/tomoxyz1.png! |
||
| 315 | 1 | Amber Herold | |
| 316 | |||
| 317 | By activate "show model parameters" check box in the viewer, more plots are shown |
||
| 318 | (Figure 2). phi and "optical axis" offset remain fixed below 30 deg while z0 is recalculated |
||
| 319 | at each tilt. As you can see, the fitting of the former two parameters are not very stable |
||
| 320 | in this first trial. Therefore, we need to do the second run. |
||
| 321 | |||
| 322 | |||
| 323 | 6 | Amber Herold | *Figure 2* |
| 324 | !http://emg.nysbc.org/software/leginon/images/images/tomomodel1.png! |
||
| 325 | 1 | Amber Herold | |
| 326 | |||
| 327 | Figure 3 shows the z-axis plot of the second run since the x and y does not change |
||
| 328 | significantly. Figure 4 shows its corresponding model parameters. The zero and first tilt |
||
| 329 | uses the initial model and the rest are fitted dynamically. In this run, because more than |
||
| 330 | one tilt series is found in the memory since last "reset learning", the model fitting starts |
||
| 331 | after the first tilt image is acquired. model parameters are rather stable over the whole |
||
| 332 | tilt series and suggests that the tilt axis is tilted from x-axis by about -1.3 degree, and |
||
| 333 | offset from the center of the detector by -0.6 um, and the specimen is off from eucentric |
||
| 334 | height by about -0.7 um |
||
| 335 | |||
| 336 | |||
| 337 | 6 | Amber Herold | *Figure 3* |
| 338 | !http://emg.nysbc.org/software/leginon/images/images/tomoz2.png! |
||
| 339 | 5 | Amber Herold | |
| 340 | 1 | Amber Herold | |
| 341 | 6 | Amber Herold | *Figure 4* |
| 342 | !http://emg.nysbc.org/software/leginon/images/images/tomomodel2.png! |
||
| 343 | 1 | Amber Herold | |
| 344 | |||
| 345 | |||
| 346 | |||
| 347 | Although it is not possible to maintain perfect defocus prediction in the full range of |
||
| 348 | the tilt by using a fixed model, we found that the overall performance is better if an |
||
| 349 | average tilt axis model that works well in the mid-range tilt is used as a fixed model. For |
||
| 350 | example, for the behavior in the above figure, we choose: |
||
| 351 | |||
| 352 | |||
| 353 | |||
| 354 | |||
| 355 | Use these custom values as initial model and turn on "Keep the tilt axis parameters |
||
| 356 | fixed". If the result is good, judging by consistent defocus and target tracking through out |
||
| 357 | the tilt series, this model will be saved in the database as best model automatically, and |
||
| 358 | you can revert back to initialize with the model of "only this preset". |
||
| 359 | |||
| 360 | |||
| 361 | |||
| 362 | |||
| 363 | |||
| 364 | h2. Failure of xy feature tracking |
||
| 365 | |||
| 366 | |||
| 367 | |||
| 368 | 9 | Amber Herold | Feature tracking in x and y axes is a 2nd order polynomial fit of preceeding data |
| 369 | 1 | Amber Herold | points. The default uses 5 data points. When a sudden jump occurs in the tracking error, it |
| 370 | tend to follow the trend of the last point. If the jump is a temporary clich in the |
||
| 371 | goniometer, this tend to over correct the tracking error and eventually loose track as shown |
||
| 372 | in Figure 5. A possible fix is to increase the number of data points in the fitting. This |
||
| 373 | can be set in the tomography setting "Smooth n tilts for defocus prediction". 4 in defocus |
||
| 374 | prediction is equivalent to 5 points (n+1) for xy tracking. |
||
| 375 | |||
| 376 | |||
| 377 | 6 | Amber Herold | *Figure 5* |
| 378 | !http://emg.nysbc.org/software/leginon/images/images/tomoxbad.png! |
||
| 379 | 1 | Amber Herold | |
| 380 | |||
| 381 | |||
| 382 | |||
| 383 | |||
| 384 | h2. Large tracking error between the first and second tilt |
||
| 385 | images |
||
| 386 | |||
| 387 | |||
| 388 | |||
| 389 | The first image in each tilt group of the tilt series at the "start" angle (normally 0 |
||
| 390 | deg) and the second image at tilt of "step" angle from the "start" angle do not use the |
||
| 391 | fitted model. It is assumed that the eucentric height judged by stage alpha wobbling in the |
||
| 392 | "Tomo Focus" node gives a stage height that the tracking of feature by such a small tilt |
||
| 393 | would be good enough. In most cases this is a reasonable assumption. However, we have had |
||
| 394 | experience of goniometer alignment problem where the assumption fails. The symptom is |
||
| 395 | illustrated in Figure 6 below. Note that the Feature tracking error is displayed as |
||
| 396 | percentage of the image length. |
||
| 397 | |||
| 398 | |||
| 399 | 6 | Amber Herold | *Figure 6* |
| 400 | !http://emg.nysbc.org/software/leginon/images/images/tomoz0bad.png! |
||
| 401 | 1 | Amber Herold | |
| 402 | |||
| 403 | 11 | Amber Herold | This tilt series was taken with a starting angle of zero and at an image size of < 1 |
| 404 | um. As can be seen here, apart from the 2 and minus 2 degree tilts, the tracking error was less |
||
| 405 | 8 | Amber Herold | than 2 % of the image. Only the tracking of the feature between 0 and +/- 2 degrees are |
| 406 | 11 | Amber Herold | large. At close to 20 % error, this made the overlap between plus and minus 2 degrees unacceptable and |
| 407 | 1 | Amber Herold | often cause popular alignment programs to misalign the two half of the series. |
| 408 | |||
| 409 | |||
| 410 | The first solution is of course to report it to your microscope service engineer. When |
||
| 411 | we had this problem, many users noticed that it was difficult to adjust stage to eucentric |
||
| 412 | height manually with alpha wobbler. Features jumped while the goniometer changed rotation |
||
| 413 | direction. In addition, different magnitude of tilt range suggests different eucentric |
||
| 414 | heights. It is not easy to fix this, so it might take a while. |
||
| 415 | |||
| 416 | |||
| 417 | Before the hardware is fixed physically, it is still possible collect tomograms. The |
||
| 418 | model fitting of the overall curve in the above case gave z0 of +5 um through the whole tilt |
||
| 419 | series (Figure not shown). Therefore, by moving the stage up by such an amount after the |
||
| 420 | stage-tilt-based autofocusing can bring us to the correct height for tomography. This can |
||
| 421 | be acheived by saving the "tomo eucentric" focus current to the database, align rotation |
||
| 422 | center for this stage height and focus. Then change the correction type of the |
||
| 423 | "Beam_Tilt_Fine" focusing step to "Stage Z". |
||
| 424 | |||
| 425 | |||
| 426 | |||
| 427 | |||
| 428 | |||
| 429 | h2. Failure of model-based correction |
||
| 430 | |||
| 431 | |||
| 432 | |||
| 433 | The model used in the defocus correction in Leginon tomography node is a very simplified |
||
| 434 | one. There are a few cases when the approach fails. Here are ones that we have |
||
| 435 | encountered: |
||
| 436 | |||
| 437 | |||
| 438 | |||
| 439 | h2. Y-axis looping |
||
| 440 | |||
| 441 | |||
| 442 | |||
| 443 | The microscope goniometer does not move on only the tilt axis. With its complex |
||
| 444 | structure, a common problem is that when the stage is highly tilt, the position slips in |
||
| 445 | the y-direction. This is known as looping. Figure 7 shows an example of this problem. |
||
| 446 | |||
| 447 | |||
| 448 | 6 | Amber Herold | *Figure 7* |
| 449 | !http://emg.nysbc.org/software/leginon/images/images/tomoxyloop.png! |
||
| 450 | 1 | Amber Herold | |
| 451 | |||
| 452 | While the x-axis position shifts monotonically as a stable model should be, the y-axis |
||
| 453 | in the positive tilt direction changes little from 0-30 degrees before it increases |
||
| 454 | rapidly after 30 degrees. Even though the tracking in xy plane is still good, the defocii |
||
| 455 | correction at these higher tilts may no longer be correct if the tilt axis parameters are |
||
| 456 | fitted dynamically. Figure 8 shows the model parameters of the same tilt series where the |
||
| 457 | fitted phi and offset starts to change above 30 degrees even though the tilt axis has not |
||
| 458 | moved according to the shrinking behavior of the images during the tilts. Note that in |
||
| 459 | this particular case the looping problem is still mild so that the over-correction is not |
||
| 460 | very strong. only a small slope change is resulted in z0 prediction. In worst cases, the |
||
| 461 | defocus over-correction is so large that the adjacent images can not correlate properly |
||
| 462 | and even the xy tracking would fail. The spikes around zero tilt is a display data sorting |
||
| 463 | error of the identical starting tilt of the two tilt groups. |
||
| 464 | |||
| 465 | |||
| 466 | 6 | Amber Herold | *Figure 8* |
| 467 | !http://emg.nysbc.org/software/leginon/images/images/tomomodelloop.png! |
||
| 468 | 1 | Amber Herold | |
| 469 | |||
| 470 | Other than asking microscope service engineer to fix the looping, one can find the |
||
| 471 | best fixed model in the series to apply to future tilt data collection. To make the fixed |
||
| 472 | model permantly saved to the database, follow these steps: |
||
| 473 | |||
| 474 | |||
| 475 | 12 | Amber Herold | # tomography/settings/model>activate "keep the tilt axis parameters |
| 476 | 1 | Amber Herold | fixed". |
| 477 | 12 | Amber Herold | # tomography/settings/model>initialize the model with "custom values". Enter best |
| 478 | 1 | Amber Herold | estimate of the fixed model. For example, in the positive direction, enter phi as |
| 479 | -2.17 degrees and axis offset as -1.52 um. since these are the stable values up to the |
||
| 480 | point the y-looping starts. |
||
| 481 | 12 | Amber Herold | # tomography>collect a full tilt series. If the run is successful with good |
| 482 | 1 | Amber Herold | tracking in all three axis, the model will be saved in the database for this |
| 483 | magnification. |
||
| 484 | 12 | Amber Herold | # tomography/settings/model>From now on, you can initialize the model with "only |
| 485 | 1 | Amber Herold | this preset" or "this preset and lower mags" |
| 486 | |||
| 487 | |||
| 488 | |||
| 489 | |||
| 490 | |||
| 491 | |||
| 492 | |||
| 493 | h2. Grid slips between the first and second tilt directions |
||
| 494 | |||
| 495 | |||
| 496 | |||
| 497 | When the holder does not hold the grid tightly, the grid slips to a different position |
||
| 498 | when the first tilt direction ends and the goniometer quickly returns to zero tilt. |
||
| 499 | Leginon is designed to adjust the target before the second tilt group starts. The default |
||
| 500 | setting for this function is to use only the parent image (i.e. one ancestor) where the |
||
| 501 | target comes from as reference. If the slip is larger than the size of the parent image, |
||
| 502 | the adjustment may fail, and a random target would be acquired in the second tilt |
||
| 503 | group. |
||
| 504 | |||
| 505 | |||
| 506 | Starting from Leginon 1.6, the target adjustment can be done with all ancestor images |
||
| 507 | of the target by choosing "all" in the acquisition part of the tomography node setting to |
||
| 508 | 12 | Amber Herold | adjust target with all ancestors. The node "Target Adjustment" limits the lowest |
| 509 | 1 | Amber Herold | magnification that this target adjustment would go up in ancestry. The default is at 300x |
| 510 | 12 | Amber Herold | so that the presence of the objective aperture does not create difference in the reacquired |
| 511 | 1 | Amber Herold | ancestor image from its original. |
| 512 | |||
| 513 | |||
| 514 | |||
| 515 | |||
| 516 | |||
| 517 | h2. Strong and continuous specimen drift |
||
| 518 | |||
| 519 | |||
| 520 | |||
| 521 | The model used in Leginon considers any shift of feature in the image a result of tilt |
||
| 522 | axis not aligning to the center of the detector. With the phi and offset fixed, all errors |
||
| 523 | are accumulated in z0 and results in bad defocus correction. There is no solution to this |
||
| 524 | at the moment. |
||
| 525 | 13 | Amber Herold | |
| 526 | |||
| 527 | |||
| 528 | |||
| 529 | ______ |
||
| 530 | |||
| 531 | [[Set-up Before Running|< Set-up Before Running]] | [[Full Protocol on a F30 with an energy filter| Full Protocol on a F30 with an energy filter >]] |