Troubles with Tomography » History » Version 2
Amber Herold, 04/27/2010 02:19 PM
| 1 | 1 | Amber Herold | h1. Troubles with Tomography |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | |||
| 3 | |||
| 4 | |||
| 5 | * <link linkend="tomo_intensity">Image appears oversaturated with overflow to negative |
||
| 6 | values</link> |
||
| 7 | |||
| 8 | |||
| 9 | * <link linkend="tomo_intensity">Images acquired in tomography have different |
||
| 10 | intensity range from that acquired from other nodes with the same preset and exposure |
||
| 11 | time.</link> |
||
| 12 | |||
| 13 | |||
| 14 | * <link linkend="tomo_large_move">Images move by a large amount between |
||
| 15 | tilts.</link> |
||
| 16 | |||
| 17 | |||
| 18 | |||
| 19 | |||
| 20 | |||
| 21 | |||
| 22 | |||
| 23 | h2. Unusual intensity range in the tomography image |
||
| 24 | |||
| 25 | |||
| 26 | |||
| 27 | Two possible reasons: |
||
| 28 | |||
| 29 | |||
| 30 | * The exposure time has been modified by the tomography node to spread the total dose |
||
| 31 | to all images in the tomogram. |
||
| 32 | |||
| 33 | |||
| 34 | Solution: Reduce the total dose or reduce preset beam intensity. You can find the |
||
| 35 | real exposure time from the log panel of the tomography node or through the information |
||
| 36 | page of the image in the web image viewers. |
||
| 37 | |||
| 38 | |||
| 39 | * The image intensity of images collected by the Tomography class node does not have |
||
| 40 | the same meaning as in other images in Leginoon. The flat-field corrected intensity |
||
| 41 | values are multiplied by 10 before the image is saved and displayed as MRC image as |
||
| 42 | signed 16-bit integer. Therefore any original CCD count of 3276.8 or larger will |
||
| 43 | overflow. All other images in Leginon are saved without manipulation as float. |
||
| 44 | Therefore, the images obtained through tomography node and another acquisition nodes |
||
| 45 | will appear differently in the both the web image viewer and within Leginon. |
||
| 46 | |||
| 47 | |||
| 48 | Solution: Reduce the total dose. |
||
| 49 | |||
| 50 | |||
| 51 | Find out what exposure time corresponds to the fractionated dose from your tilt |
||
| 52 | angle step and range and total dose and take an image at tomo preset with such an |
||
| 53 | exposure in Navigation node. You will need to reduce the total dose if a good fraction |
||
| 54 | of the counts are larger than 3200 even though it would not appear to be saturated in |
||
| 55 | the float scale without the 10x factor. |
||
| 56 | |||
| 57 | |||
| 58 | |||
| 59 | |||
| 60 | |||
| 61 | |||
| 62 | |||
| 63 | h2. Large movement between tilted images |
||
| 64 | |||
| 65 | |||
| 66 | |||
| 67 | Find out how smooth the movement is by comparing the images. |
||
| 68 | |||
| 69 | |||
| 70 | If transition is smooth and linear: |
||
| 71 | |||
| 72 | |||
| 73 | * Magnification too high |
||
| 74 | |||
| 75 | |||
| 76 | Solution: Lower the magnification or perform <link linkend="Tomo_low_mag_fitting" |
||
| 77 | >low-magnification rough model fitting</link>. |
||
| 78 | |||
| 79 | |||
| 80 | * Optical axis offset model is too different from the initial guess for the |
||
| 81 | non-linear least-square fitting. |
||
| 82 | |||
| 83 | |||
| 84 | Solution: Perform <link linkend="Tomo_low_mag_fitting">low-magnification rough model |
||
| 85 | fitting</link>. |
||
| 86 | |||
| 87 | |||
| 88 | |||
| 89 | |||
| 90 | If transition is not smooth nor linear: |
||
| 91 | |||
| 92 | |||
| 93 | * Goniometer behavior unpredictable |
||
| 94 | |||
| 95 | |||
| 96 | Solution: Service the goniometer. |
||
| 97 | 2 | Amber Herold | |
| 98 | |||
| 99 | ______ |
||
| 100 | |||
| 101 | [[Troubles with Calibrations - Troubleshooting|< Troubles with Calibrations - Troubleshooting]] |
||
| 102 | |||
| 103 | ______ |