Public Datasets

h1. Anontated Dataset of Images of Keyhole Limpet Hemocyanin Particles II 

h2. 1. Imaging Conditions

Using a FEI Tecnai F20 equipped with a 2Kx2K CCD Tietz camera, images are acquired in defocus pairs at a nominal magnification of 62,000 x and a voltage of 120 KeV, using the Leginon system (Potter et al., 1999; Carragher et al., 2000). The first image (named *.001.mrc) is acquired at very near to focus (NTF) conditions (-0.6 to -1.5 µm) and the second one (named *.002.mrc) at farther from focus (FFF) conditions (-3 µm). The time interval between the two exposures is approximately 20s due to the time required to read out the digital image from the camera. The pixel size is 2.22 Å at the specimen scale, and the accumulated dose for high magnification NTF image area was about 10 e/Ų. Figure 1 shows an example pair of defocus images. Click on them to see the pictures in full size. 

p=. (a) !fig1a.jpg!:http://emg.nysbc.org/prtl_data/klh/klh_10k/fig1a.jpg           (b) !fig1b.jpg!:http://emg.nysbc.org/prtl_data/klh/klh_10k/fig1b.jpg

(a) Near to focus - NTF image. (b) Far from focus - FFF image.

p=. *Figure 1: An example pair of high magnification images of KLH.*

There are at least two major advantages of using a defocus pair of images. First, by combining the two images in the defocus pair, relatively high contrast at both low and high spatial frequencies can be attained. Second, the moderately strong low-resolution signals in the FFF images make it possible for us to develop algorithms to identify particles automatically. The idea of using a defocus pair of images has been explored by several other researchers. 

h2. 2. Downloading High Magnification Images

Image files are in MRC format. We also provide a JPEG file for each image for your convenience in viewing them. The annotated dataset of 655 high magnification images is only part of the image data acquired on October 9, 2002 in a single experiment session. You may use one of the following options to download the whole set of high magnification images. 

Download the whole experiment dataset using our download wizard, called [[Dbemwiz|dbemwiz.jar]]. Here are a few tips for using the wizard to download the whole set of high magnification images: (i) Log in as anonymous.     (ii)Select "Custom" for Image Type and get "Exposures" checked as shown in Figure 2a; meanwhile you may chose either "mrc" or "jpg" to download only MRC or JPEG files, respectively. (iii) From the list of Experiments select "02oct09a", shown in Figure 2b, which is the experiment key used in our Leginon system. 

p=. (a) !wizard_1_chopped.jpg!           (b) !wizard_2_chopped.jpg!

p=. *Figure 2: Screenshots of using the wizard with the above tips to download the whole set of high magnification images.*

h2. 3. Coordinates of the Picked Particles in the Images

Since the NTF image in a defocus pair covers almost the same specimen area as the FFF image, the relative distance between particles within the NTF image should be the same as that in the FFF image. Using phase correlation, we are able to accurately align the NTF image to the FFF image in a defocus pair (Zhu et al., 2001). Therefore particles in the NTF image can be then extracted using the positions of the particles selected in the FFF image shifted according to the results of the alignment. We provide in the following only the positions of particles automatically selected in the FFF images.

p=. (a) !fig3a.jpg!:http://emg.nysbc.org/prtl_data/klh/klh_10k/fig3a.jpg           (b) !fig3b.jpg!:http://emg.nysbc.org/prtl_data/klh/klh_10k/fig3b.jpg

(a) The NTF image. (b) The FFF image.

p=. *Figure 3: An example pair of images outlined with particles selected by Selexon. Each "+" indicate a detected particle.*

As we mentioned in the introduction, particle picking is an open, unresolved problem. Even for biological experts, the final picks may vary from person to person. Besides posting the particles picked by our own program *Selexon*, we will also post other manual/automated picks upon available. For each set of picked particles, we give a brief description of the criteria for manual picks, or the algorithm for automated picks. Links to more detailed descriptions will be provided when available.

h2. 4. Sample 3D Reconstructions 

h2. 5. References 

 # Carragher, B., Kisseberth, N., Kriegman, D., Milligan, R. A., Potter, C. S., Pulokas, J., and Reilein, A. (2000) Leginon: An automated system for acquisition of images from vitreous ice specimens. J. Struct. Biol. *132*: 33-45. 

 # Potter, C. S., Chu, H., Frey, B., Green, C., Kisseberth, N., Mad-den, T. J., Miller, K. L., Nahrstedt, K., Pulokas, J., Reilein, A., Tcheng, D., Weber, D., and Carragher, B. (1999) Leginon: A system for fully automated acquisition of 1000 micrographs a day. Ultramicroscopy *77*: 153-161. 

 # Zhu, Y., B. Carragher, D. Kriegman, R. Milligan, and C. Potter (2001) Automated Identification of Filaments in Cryo-electron Microscopy Images. J. Struct. Biol. *135*: 302-312. 

 # Zhu, Y., Carragher, B., and Potter, C. S. (2003) Automatic Particle Detection Through Efficient Hough Transforms. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 22(9): 1053-1062.