Project

General

Profile

Actions

Feature #1907

open

features for automated common lines

Added by Arne Moeller about 12 years ago.

Status:
New
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Category:
-
Target version:
-
Start date:
07/16/2012
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:

Description

Hi Dmitry,
you wanted me to put down the things I've noted running automated common lines:

1. Final map name should have a date/project associated to it - makes it easier to keep track of which map was which
2. I like the idea to create and run it on a Template Stack. The disadvantage is that Templatestacks are Project and not Session related. This can cause confusion if you are running several sessions within one project - what do you think?
3. I think it is necessary to compare projections and related backprojections for each final result map - It would be really cool if one could go one step below that and see the projections and backprojections of the original maps that were later merged too - but that is not so important
4. Again not so important - Would it be possible to limit the number of classes that go into one map (before averaging?).


Related issues 1 (0 open1 closed)

Related to Appion - Feature #1900: automated common lines addition (using angular reconstitution)ClosedMelody Campbell07/09/2012

Actions

No data to display

Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF