Bug #4122
closedctf plot for envelope normalization looks wrong on an unusually good image
0%
Description
The image attached is taken on lacey carbon on Krios.
300 kV, Cs=2.7 mm pixel size 1.09699 Angstrom
I fit it to 2.2 Angstrom and modify apDisplay to display 1D plot to 2.3 Å.
The result of the normalization looks good, though.
Files
Updated by Neil Voss over 8 years ago
I will take a look, the bad envelope comes from a bad noise fit.
Updated by Neil Voss over 8 years ago
- Project changed from TiltPicker to Appion
- Affected Version set to Appion/Leginon 2.2.0
Updated by Anchi Cheng over 8 years ago
- Priority changed from Normal to Urgent
- Affected Version changed from Appion/Leginon 2.2.0 to Appion/Leginon 3.3
Neil, Please work on this asap. I really want to merge your ctf stuff to myami-beta but I can not do so until it works right. It might be as simple as a problem of plot scale. As you can see, and I observed on other plots that the minimum in Y is 1.0, not 0.0 which I assume it should be.
Updated by Neil Voss over 8 years ago
Works now, I had to adjust the parameters which floors the data.
Updated by Neil Voss over 8 years ago
- Status changed from Assigned to In Test
- Assignee changed from Neil Voss to Anchi Cheng
Updated by Anchi Cheng about 8 years ago
- File 16oct04c_a_00050gr_00012sq_v01_00006hl_v01_00004ex-a.mrc 16oct04c_a_00050gr_00012sq_v01_00006hl_v01_00004ex-a.mrc added
- Assignee changed from Anchi Cheng to Neil Voss
Neil,
3d4e2a6b further changes this. I have many images from K2 camera that end up with flat line from the last commit. This new change at least make it a bit better. These images have normexprotdata maximum smaller or close to 1.0.
The result of this commit still gives the first section envelop (magenta) line away from the data (blue) and fit(green) in the example attached. Therefore, I might still missed something. Hope you can find out where.
For other testing, try the appion testdata set of GroEL images. I can also give you more images of this type or phase plate images which are usually -0.5 um defocus and with large values at low resolution.
An example is attached.
ctffind4 result
# Output from CTFFind version 4.1.5, run on 2016-10-05 15:19:28 # Input file: 16oct04c_a_050gr_012sq_06hl_04ex-a.mrc ; Number of micrographs: 1 # Pixel size: 0.900 Angstroms ; acceleration voltage: 300.0 keV ; spherical aber ration: 2.20 mm ; amplitude contrast: 0.07 # Box size: 1024 pixels ; min. res.: 50.0 Angstroms ; max. res.: 3.0 Angstroms ; min. def.: 1000.0 um; max. def. 46929.8 um # Columns: #1 - micrograph number; #2 - defocus 1 [Angstroms]; #3 - defocus 2; # 4 - azimuth of astigmatism; #5 - additional phase shift [radians]; #6 - cross co rrelation; #7 - spacing (in Angstroms) up to which CTF rings were fit successful ly 1.000000 22435.417969 21929.798828 73.746925 0.000000 0.019749 6.433184
Appion input
ctffind4.py --ampcontrast=0.07 --fieldsize=1024 --resmin=50 --resmax=3 --defstep=0.1 --numstep=25 --dast=0.05 --best-images --min_phase_shift=10 --max_phase_shift=170 --phase_search_step=10 --runname=ctffind4run4 --rundir=/nis/ucsd-02/appion/16oct04c/ctf/ctffind4run4 --preset=ex-a --commit --projectid=4 --session=16oct04c --no-rejects --no-continue --expid=19 --jobtype=ctfestimate --no-wai
Updated by Neil Voss almost 8 years ago
- Status changed from In Test to Closed
these changes look good.