Project

General

Profile

CTF Estimation » History » Version 12

Anchi Cheng, 06/09/2013 09:38 PM

1 1 Amber Herold
h1. CTF Estimation
2
3 5 Anke Mulder
Image formation in EM is distorted by modulation of a contrast transfer function (CTF).  Distortion depends on the physical parameters of the microscope, such as keV and lens abberations.  Correcting for these aberrations is done by comparing the experimentally observed power spectral density (PSD) of EM images to a theoretically generated CTF.
4 1 Amber Herold
5 4 Anke Mulder
h2. Available CTF Procedures:
6
7 3 Amber Herold
# [[Ace Estimation]]
8
# [[Ace 2 Estimation]]
9 10 Anke Mulder
# [[CtfFind Estimation]]
10 1 Amber Herold
11
12 4 Anke Mulder
h2. Appion SideBar Snapshot:
13
14 6 Anke Mulder
!http://emg.nysbc.org/attachments/209/Picture_114.png!
15 4 Anke Mulder
16 8 Anke Mulder
h2. Notes, Comments, and Suggestions:
17 4 Anke Mulder
18 12 Anchi Cheng
[[Appion CTF parameter definition]]
19
20 11 Anchi Cheng
If you have a large range of defocus in your data, one parameter set or even one estimation method may not work for all of them.  In this case, you can start a separate run but choose a different parameters that only process those with low confidence results.  Next appion processing (stack making) will pick the result with highest confidence value image by image to be used.  Note that Ace and Ace 2 have in general equivalent confidence values while CtfFind values tend to lower which makes it harder to mix and match currently.  See forum http://emg.nysbc.org/boards/13/topics/990
21
22 9 Anke Mulder
!http://emg.nysbc.org/attachments/282/Picture_83.png!
23 8 Anke Mulder
!http://emg.nysbc.org/attachments/277/Picture_81.png!
24 7 Anke Mulder
______
25 4 Anke Mulder
26
[[Particle Selection|< Particle Selection]] | [[Stacks|Create Particle Stack >]]
27 1 Amber Herold
28
______